1. Admissions and Infrastructure Operate Separately
Admission teams forecast intake. Facilities teams track infrastructure. Finance monitors capital budgets. If these systems do not share architecture, infrastructure planning is based on outdated projections, capacity assessments lack enrollment context, and expansion decisions are speculative.
2. Revenue Forecasting Is Not Linked to Capacity Planning
Infrastructure investments should reflect program-level profitability, scholarship-adjusted revenue, installment compliance rates, and multi-campus growth patterns. Without unified dashboards, financial viability is separated from space planning.
3. Academic Scheduling Is Isolated from Infrastructure Strategy
If academic timetables are built independently, classroom utilization data is not factored into expansion decisions, lab demand trends remain hidden, and faculty growth may not align with physical space availability.
According to Deloitte’s higher education capital planning research, institutions that integrate enrollment forecasting with infrastructure analytics achieve stronger long-term capital efficiency.
Source:
https://www2.deloitte.com/Growth without data creates structural strain.