1. Attendance–Eligibility Disconnect
If attendance is not linked directly to exam eligibility, students below minimum thresholds may be missed, manual verification delays hall ticket issuance, and faculty must re-check compliance manually. Eligibility should be system-enforced — not cross-verified.
2. Internal Assessment Fragmentation
Internal components often include assignments, quizzes, presentations, projects, and mid-semester exams. When weightages are calculated manually, errors in grade aggregation occur, revisions require repeated recalculation, and faculty workload increases. Automation ensures structured weightage logic.
3. Delayed Consolidation Before Exams
Before final exams, internal marks must merge with attendance eligibility. Data is often compiled from multiple sources. Last-minute reconciliation creates stress. Integrated tracking removes this bottleneck.
4. Limited Real-Time Visibility
Without dashboards, deans cannot see attendance trends, academic heads lack early warning indicators, and at-risk students are identified too late.
According to EDUCAUSE research, institutions using integrated academic systems improve academic governance efficiency and student outcomes.
Source:
https://www.educause.edu/research-and-publicationsFragmentation delays academic intervention.